Maintainers Matter

The case against upstream packaging (postscript)

Comments are moderated. It may take a few minutes before your comment appears.
Markdown is supported in your comments.

Mostly a maintainer is a packager: they take software from an ISV and repackage it for a distribution's packaging system. And here is where some people feel is a huge waste. Why package the same software a hundred times for a hundred different distributions? (There is good reason for this "waste", but let me finish describing everything else a maintainer does.)

Mail: (not shown)

Please type this: